USA · 2L · Constitutional Law
Structure & Powers
Judicial review, federalism, separation of powers.
Space flip · ← → navigate · S save
Show all 5 questions and answers in this book
1.Marbury v. Madison (1803) — principle established?
Judicial review: it is "emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is"; courts may strike down statutes that conflict with the Constitution.
Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)
2.McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) — two holdings?
(1) Congress has implied powers under the Necessary and Proper Clause (it could charter a national bank); (2) a state may not tax a federal instrumentality.
McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 U.S. 316 (1819)
3.Wickard v. Filburn (1942) — held?
Under the aggregation principle, Congress may regulate purely local activity (home-grown wheat) that, in the aggregate, substantially affects interstate commerce.
Wickard v. Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942)
4.United States v. Lopez (1995) — held?
The Gun-Free School Zones Act exceeded Congress's Commerce Clause power; possessing a gun near a school is not economic activity substantially affecting interstate commerce.
United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549 (1995)
5.Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (1952) — Jackson's framework?
Presidential power is (1) at its maximum when acting with congressional authorisation, (2) in a "zone of twilight" when Congress is silent, and (3) at its lowest ebb when acting against Congress's will.
Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, 343 U.S. 579 (1952) (Jackson J., concurring)