New Zealand · Year 2 · Public Law
Constitution & NZBORA
An unwritten constitution with a statutory bill of rights.
Space flip · ← → navigate · S save
Show all 7 questions and answers in this book
1.New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990, s 4?
Courts may not hold any enactment impliedly repealed, invalid or ineffective because it is inconsistent with the Bill of Rights.
NZBORA 1990, s 4
2.NZBORA, ss 5 and 6?
s 5: rights may be subject only to reasonable limits prescribed by law that can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society. s 6: a meaning consistent with the rights is to be preferred.
NZBORA 1990, ss 5–6
3.NZBORA, s 7?
The Attorney-General must report to Parliament where a Bill appears inconsistent with the rights and freedoms in the Act.
NZBORA 1990, s 7
4.Attorney-General v Taylor [2018] — held?
Senior courts have jurisdiction to make declarations of inconsistency with NZBORA (here, the blanket ban on prisoner voting).
[2018] NZSC 104
5.Make It 16 Inc v Attorney-General [2022] — held?
The voting age of 18 is an unjustified limit on freedom from age discrimination (s 19 NZBORA); a declaration of inconsistency was made.
[2022] NZSC 134
6.Fitzgerald v Muldoon [1976] — held?
The Prime Minister's announcement suspending superannuation contributions without legislation breached s 1 of the Bill of Rights 1688.
[1976] 2 NZLR 615
7.When did New Zealand adopt MMP?
Chosen in the 1993 referendum; first MMP election held in 1996.
Electoral Act 1993